Extraordinary Telepathic Encounter: My TRAUMATIC Experience With Non-Human Beings
The encounter with beings that seemed to come from elsewhere marked a profound and life-changing experience. While initially hesitant to share these events publicly, the decision to speak up came from both an external request and a personal realization. The individuals encountered during this experience specifically encouraged openness about what happened, stating they wanted this information shared with others.
After the encounter, processing the experience proved challenging. Conversations with family members and friends often resulted in blank stares and difficulty connecting—a natural response when others cannot relate to something so far outside normal human experience. The presence of witnesses during parts of the encounter provided important validation, as multiple people observed the interaction taking place, adding credibility to something that might otherwise seem impossible to believe.
Key Takeaways
The decision to share unusual experiences publicly often involves overcoming personal reluctance and responding to a perceived responsibility to others.
Witnessing unusual phenomena with multiple observers adds crucial credibility and helps validate experiences that fall outside conventional understanding.
Recognizing patterns across different reported encounters can provide valuable insights when examining unexplained phenomena.
The Choice to Publicly Share My Encounter
After my extraordinary experience, I faced the difficult decision of whether to share it with others. This was not an easy choice, as discussing such unusual encounters often leads to skepticism. My initial reaction wasn't to rush and tell everyone about what happened.
The morning after the encounter, I texted my wife saying, "I think I met them last night and I can't stop crying." She immediately asked if these were happy tears, a fair question that I couldn't answer clearly. When I finally returned home, I shared the complete story with both her and my children.
For some time afterward, I only discussed the experience with people I felt comfortable opening up to. I noticed their reactions were consistently similar—a kind of blank stare that reflected the difficulty in processing something so far outside normal experience. This response wasn't surprising, as it's nearly impossible to fully understand such an encounter without having experienced it firsthand.
Encouragement to Discuss Publicly
Two key factors ultimately influenced my decision to speak openly about my experience:
Direct instruction from the entities - During the encounter, I asked if I could talk about what happened, and they specifically stated they wanted me to share the experience.
Personal integrity - Having researched and written about other experiencers, I realized it would be hypocritical to keep silent while appreciating others' courage to come forward.
It took nearly a year before I felt ready to discuss the encounter publicly. This hesitation is common among experiencers, contrary to the assumption that people share these stories for attention. In fact, I dedicated my second book to "the brave women and men" willing to share their unusual experiences, recognizing that without their courage, we couldn't gather valuable information about these phenomena.
While sharing such experiences is important, I believe we should approach all accounts with healthy skepticism. We should question potential motives and maintain critical thinking about all aspects of these phenomena, while still respecting those who step forward with their stories.
Lunch Break and Continuation
After our initial discussion, we took a brief pause for lunch before diving back into the conversation. When we resumed, I shared more details about how my experience affected my personal life.
My wife's reaction was quite telling. The morning after the encounter, I woke up fully clothed with my shoes still on, crying uncontrollably—a response that felt more physiological than emotional. I texted her saying, "I think I met them last night and I can't stop crying." Her first question was simple: "Happy tears?"
I explained that I believed I had encountered future humans, though they never explicitly confirmed this. When I telepathically asked who they were, they indicated that once I understood how they knew things, I would understand who they were. This felt like an oversimplification of something more complex.
The presence of witnesses was significant. Having multiple people observe the interaction helped validate the reality of what occurred. The two individuals on the balcony and the group inside watching created a scenario where others could confirm something unusual had happened, unlike my earlier solitary experience with the slate.
Sharing this experience publicly wasn't easy. It took a full year before I spoke about it openly. Two factors ultimately influenced my decision:
When I asked the beings if I could discuss the encounter, they specifically said they wanted me to talk about it
I realized it would be hypocritical to rely on others' brave accounts for my research while keeping my own experience private
My second book applies an abductive approach—examining numerous cases across 90 years and five continents to identify patterns. This method involves gathering extensive information and inferring the best explanation rather than trying to prove a predetermined theory.
The credibility of unusual experiences often increases with multiple witnesses, while the strangeness factor correlates with how far the event deviates from conventional reality. Using J. Allen Hynek's metrics from Project Blue Book provides a framework for evaluating these encounters, balancing reliability against strangeness.
Sharing the Unusual Encounter with a Spouse
Telling His Wife About the Experience
The morning after the encounter, he found himself in a peculiar emotional state—crying uncontrollably without understanding why. This appeared to be a physiological response rather than emotional sadness. He texted his wife with the simple message: "I think I met them last night and I can't stop crying." Her first response was straightforward and curious: "Happy tears?" This question caught him off-guard as he wasn't sure how to categorize his emotional state.
Communication initially happened through text since he couldn't call due to conference commitments. The brief exchange highlighted how difficult it was to convey the magnitude of what had occurred in short messages. When he finally returned home, he shared the complete experience with both his wife and children, carefully detailing the encounter from beginning to end.
Examining the Wife's Response
The reaction from his wife, like many others he would later share the story with, included a certain blank expression that became familiar as he told more people. This wasn't necessarily disbelief but rather the natural difficulty anyone would have processing such an extraordinary account without having experienced it firsthand.
His spouse's questions were practical and grounded. When he mentioned meeting what he believed were "future humans," she approached the situation with genuine curiosity rather than immediate dismissal. Her initial question about whether his tears were from happiness demonstrated her attempt to understand his emotional state following the encounter.
The family dynamic around this disclosure evolved over time. While initially "super weird," discussions about the experience gradually became more normalized within their household. His wife's support was evident as he worked through his own understanding of what had happened, even as he continued trying to process the implications himself.
Nature of the Contact
Potential Recognition of Advanced Human Entities
I initially believed I had encountered future humans during this extraordinary experience. This impression formed when I telepathically questioned their identity. While they didn't explicitly confirm this, they responded with an intriguing statement: "Once you know how we know, you'll know who we are." Following this cryptic answer, they simply continued our interaction without direct confirmation.
The entire encounter had a purposeful design. Having two individuals present on the balcony wasn't merely to capture my attention but served a broader purpose. Multiple witnesses both on the balcony and observing from inside created a validation mechanism for the reality of what occurred. This arrangement provided credibility that wouldn't exist had I been alone.
Absence of Definitive Confirmation
It's important to note that describing these beings as "future humans" likely represents an oversimplification. Though this was my immediate impression, they never directly confirmed this identity. Their non-confirmation while continuing our interaction suggests a more complex reality than my initial assessment could capture.
The structure of the encounter—with witnesses present and the three women who emerged—appears deliberately orchestrated to establish credibility. This arrangement created a scenario where others could verify that some form of unusual interaction had occurred, even if they couldn't access the telepathic exchange. The presence of multiple observers provided a foundation of reliability that wouldn't exist in a solitary experience.
Engaging in Dialogue
Sharing Personal Experiences and Interpretations
When discussing extraordinary encounters with others, individuals often face unique challenges. Many experiencers initially struggle with how much to reveal and to whom. The decision to share publicly frequently stems from a sense of responsibility rather than desire for attention. Some experiencers report being explicitly encouraged to share their stories by the entities they encountered, creating an ethical obligation to speak out.
People who divulge unusual experiences typically receive varied reactions. Family members may respond with confusion or curiosity, often asking clarifying questions like "happy tears?" when witnessing emotional aftermath. These conversations can be difficult as the experiencer themselves may still be processing what happened.
Witness Dynamics and Credibility
The presence of additional witnesses significantly affects how experiences are perceived. Multiple observers create a validation effect that single-witness events lack. This pattern appears intentional in some cases, with entities seemingly orchestrating encounters to ensure multiple people are present.
Witnesses often display similar reactions when hearing about extraordinary events. Many exhibit what experiencers describe as a "blank stare" - not necessarily disbelief, but an inability to fully process information that falls outside normal frames of reference. This reaction is understandable, as secondhand accounts cannot replicate the full impact of direct experience.
Children's Exposure to Unusual Phenomena
Children sometimes become indirect participants in extraordinary experiences through their parents. When experiencers have families, they must decide how much to share with their children, creating unique parenting challenges. This creates complex family dynamics as children may witness their parent's emotional processing of events without fully understanding the cause.
Researchers note that children often display different reaction patterns than adults when exposed to accounts of unusual phenomena. They typically exhibit greater openness and less skepticism, lacking the rigid reality frameworks most adults have established. This generational difference influences how family units collectively integrate and make sense of extraordinary experiences.
Insights from the Field Expert
Personal Challenges with Going Public
Revealing my unusual encounter proved much more difficult than anticipated. The emotional weight of sharing such an extraordinary experience created significant internal conflict. I didn't want to become just another person claiming a strange encounter. For many experiencing unusual phenomena, the decision to speak publicly involves overcoming substantial personal hesitation and fear of judgment.
My wife's initial reaction showed the complexity of processing such experiences. When I texted her saying "I think I met them last night and I can't stop crying," her first response was simply, "happy tears?" This highlights how difficult these experiences are to categorize emotionally, even for those closest to us.
Witnesses played a crucial role in validating my experience. The presence of other people during parts of the encounter created a foundation of credibility that isolated experiences often lack. This multi-witness aspect seems purposefully designed to establish a more concrete reality.
Taking Time Before Disclosure
I waited a full year before speaking publicly about my experience. This significant delay reflects the processing time needed to come to terms with something so far outside ordinary reality. Many experiencers follow similar patterns, needing considerable time to integrate profound encounters before feeling ready to share them.
Two factors ultimately motivated my decision to speak openly. First, during my encounter, I specifically asked if I could talk about what happened, and received clear direction that they wanted me to share this information. Second, I recognized the hypocrisy of collecting other people's brave testimonies for my research while keeping my own experience private.
My professional background in analyzing patterns across unusual encounters gave me a unique perspective. Looking for consistency across cases spanning 90 years and five continents allowed me to apply an abductive approach—gathering extensive data to make inferences about the best possible explanation rather than simply proving a predetermined theory.
Distinguishing Unusual Encounters
Evaluating Reliability of Reports
Assessing the credibility of encounter reports presents significant challenges. When individuals share unusual experiences, observers often respond with blank stares or disbelief. This reaction stems from the difficulty in processing information that falls outside normal reference frames.
Witness corroboration significantly enhances reliability. Having multiple observers present during an unusual event creates a stronger foundation for believability. The presence of witnesses transforms a solitary claim into a documented occurrence with multiple perspectives.
Physical reactions often accompany genuine encounters. These may include uncontrollable emotional responses that the experiencer cannot explain rationally. Such physiological effects can serve as important indicators when evaluating reports.
Separating Authentic Encounters
Identifying patterns across multiple reports helps distinguish genuine experiences. Recurring themes and consistent elements appearing across different cases, spanning decades and continents, suggest underlying phenomena rather than fabrication.
The "strangeness and reliability" framework provides a useful evaluation tool:
Factor Low Score High Score Reliability Single witness Multiple witnesses Strangeness Easily explained Outside conventional reality
Many genuine experiencers initially resist sharing their encounters publicly. The decision to eventually speak about unusual experiences often comes from a sense of responsibility or direct encouragement from the entities encountered, rather than attention-seeking behavior.
Time elapsed between the experience and public disclosure can be telling. Those who wait significant periods before sharing their stories, sometimes years, often demonstrate more credibility than immediate public claims.
Scientific methodology can be applied through an abductive approach. This involves examining diverse cases with critical discernment, identifying patterns, and making inferences toward the most reasonable explanation without predetermined conclusions.
Patterns of Extraterrestrial Contact Events
The Beyond-Time Framework
The Beyond-Time Framework offers a structured approach to understanding unusual contact experiences that transcend conventional understanding. This framework examines recurring elements across documented encounters, identifying commonalities that suggest organized patterns rather than random occurrences.
When analyzing these experiences, we must consider that witnesses often report similar sequences of events despite having no prior contact with each other. These similarities include telepathic communication, unusual physiological responses, and the presence of multiple witnesses who can corroborate aspects of the encounter.
Key observation points in this framework include:
Communication methods: Primarily non-verbal/telepathic
Physiological effects: Involuntary emotional responses
Witness dynamics: Multiple observers often present
Disclosure encouragement: Entities frequently request sharing of experiences
Methodology of Pattern Analysis
Researchers employ a systematic approach when examining contact reports, focusing on recurring elements across diverse cases. This approach involves gathering extensive data points from different time periods and geographical locations to identify consistent patterns.
The methodology prioritizes inference to best explanation rather than attempting to prove predetermined theories. This requires examining reports with discernment while remaining open to unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated incidents.
Data collection involves careful documentation of witness statements, physical evidence, and circumstantial factors. Researchers assign different weights to reports based on both their strangeness factor and reliability metrics, with multiple witnesses significantly increasing the latter.
Drawing from Documented Encounters
Historical case studies provide valuable reference points for understanding current phenomena. By examining reports spanning nearly a century across five continents, researchers can identify enduring patterns that transcend cultural and temporal boundaries.
J. Allen Hynek's classification system remains relevant for evaluating these cases. His approach scores incidents based on:
Reliability - number of witnesses, credibility factors
Strangeness - deviation from conventional reality
Documentation - physical evidence, consistent testimony
Significantly, witnesses often initially resist sharing their experiences publicly despite encouragement from the entities themselves. This reluctance suggests authentic experiences rather than attention-seeking behavior, as those involved frequently report personal difficulty in processing and sharing their encounters.
The value of these historical cases lies not in individual reports but in the collective patterns they reveal when analyzed as a comprehensive dataset.
