TicTac UFOs Exposed: Former Air Force One Engineer Documents 3,000+ Sightings and Reveals New UAP Classifications
Recent Congressional hearings on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) have elevated the conversation about unexplained sightings. Experts like Wilbur Allen, who developed advanced spatial scan technology during his PhD research at Howard University, are analyzing the 171 Pentagon-released videos of unexplained encounters. The shift in terminology from UFOs to UAPs reflects a growing legitimacy in government discussions, with Congressional representatives now taking these phenomena seriously in ways that would have been career-ending just a decade ago.
Key Takeaways
Recent Congressional hearings have brought unprecedented legitimacy to UAP investigations with testimony from credible witnesses.
Advanced research technology like Wilbur Allen's spatial scanning captures UAP evidence in higher resolution than government equipment.
Government Engagement on UFO/UAP Phenomena
The dialogue surrounding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) has shifted dramatically in recent years, with unprecedented levels of government attention and public discourse. What was once relegated to fringe discussions has now entered mainstream political conversation, as evidenced by recent congressional activities and expert testimonies.
Wilbur Allen's Upcoming Analysis
Dr. Wilbur Allen, who developed advanced spatial scan technology through his doctoral work at Howard University, is scheduled to provide detailed insights on recent UAP developments. His expertise stems from a five-year study documenting spatial anomalies using 4K infrared technology capable of capturing energy fields associated with these objects. Dr. Allen's background includes government service, having worked on Air Force One during both the Reagan and Bush Sr. administrations.
His research utilizes uniform methodology across multiple locations, generating consistent documentation that allows for scientific comparison and analysis. The 470-nanometer "full color infrared" technology he employs offers significantly higher resolution than the 680p FLIR footage released in government materials.
Congressional Hearings and Secure Compartmented Information Facilities
Recent joint congressional hearings have featured testimony from three credible witnesses discussing UAP encounters. These proceedings represent a remarkable shift in how elected officials approach the topic. Many congressional representatives who might have avoided such discussions a decade ago now actively participate, recognizing potential national security implications.
The hearings included several notable moments where witnesses indicated they could not discuss certain matters in an open setting, suggesting the need for Secure Compartmented Information Facilities (SCIFs). These secure environments allow for the sharing of classified information beyond what can be disclosed publicly.
Key points from the hearings include:
Discussion of approximately 171 Pentagon-released videos documenting unexplained aerial phenomena
Reference to the 2004 USS Nimitz encounters that helped establish the UAP terminology
Multiple instances where witnesses deferred sensitive information to private SCIF sessions
The terminology shift from "UFO" to "UAP" represents a deliberate attempt to remove stigma from the discussion, allowing for more objective analysis without the cultural baggage associated with earlier terms. This language evolution has helped broaden participation in serious discussions about these phenomena.
Freedom of Information Act and Government Transparency
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) represents a cornerstone of democratic accountability in the United States, providing citizens with the right to request access to government records. This legislative tool has become increasingly relevant in discussions about Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) and government knowledge of unexplained encounters. Recent Congressional hearings have highlighted both the importance and limitations of transparency mechanisms regarding sensitive government information.
Limitations of FOIA with Congressional and Military Records
FOIA mechanisms face significant constraints when applied to certain branches of government, particularly Congress and the Pentagon. These limitations became evident during recent joint Congressional hearings on UAPs, where certain testimonies required private settings known as Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities (SCIFs).
Key limitations include:
FOIA applies primarily to executive branch agencies, not Congress
Pentagon information often remains shielded from public disclosure
Classified testimony must occur in secure SCIFs, away from public view
During Congressional testimony, witnesses occasionally stated they could not discuss certain topics in open settings, requiring secure facilities that were not made available. This procedural barrier highlights how even Congressional oversight has limitations when investigating sensitive phenomena.
The current transparency framework leaves significant gaps in public knowledge. While FOIA requests can target executive branch records, some of the most compelling information remains inaccessible. This creates a situation where citizens receive partial insights through selective disclosure rather than comprehensive information.
Recent hearings demonstrated this challenge when expert witnesses provided testimony but had to defer certain discussions to classified settings. This pattern leaves researchers and the public with fragmentary evidence - essentially "breadcrumbs" leading toward but never fully revealing complete information about unexplained aerial encounters.
Wilbur Allen's Research and Contributions
Dr. Wilbur Allen developed extreme spatial scan technology as part of his doctoral research at Howard University. His academic journey includes completing undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees at this institution. His professional background includes government service, notably serving on Air Force One during Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations.
For five years, Dr. Allen conducted comprehensive studies of spatial anomalies across various locations in the United States. His methodology involved consistent scanning procedures that ensured uniform data collection, producing reliable image files with consistent star patterns.
His technology operates at 4K infrared resolution, significantly exceeding the 680p FLIR equipment used in government documentation. Dr. Allen's equipment captures images at 470 nanometers, considered full-color infrared, allowing him to document energy fields associated with observed objects.
Dr. Allen's work has contributed to discussions about Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), a term that has largely replaced the more culturally loaded "UFO" designation in official contexts. The shift in terminology coincided with notable incidents such as the 2004 USS Nimitz encounters.
His methodical approach to documentation and analysis provides consistent data points across different environments. By maintaining uniform equipment setup and operational procedures, he established a standardized framework for examining these phenomena.
Understanding UAPs and Aerial Phenomenon Investigations
Evolving Terminology and Public Awareness
The shift from "UFO" (Unidentified Flying Object) to "UAP" (Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon) represents more than just a change in terminology. This linguistic evolution emerged primarily after the USS Nimitz encounters in 2004, signaling a significant transformation in how these observations are categorized and discussed. The term UFO had become burdened with cultural baggage and often carried pejorative connotations, making serious discussion difficult in professional settings.
Many individuals find it easier to engage with the concept of UAPs without facing the stigma associated with traditional UFO terminology. This distinction allows for more productive conversations among researchers, military personnel, and government officials. The recent Congressional hearings demonstrate this shift, with serious discussions taking place that would have been considered career-damaging for politicians just a decade ago.
Technological Advancements in UAP Documentation
The quality of evidence surrounding aerial phenomena has improved dramatically with technological innovation. Earlier documentation relied on low-resolution equipment, typically producing 680p FLIR (Forward-Looking Infrared) footage that lacked detail and clarity. Modern investigation methods utilize significantly more sophisticated tools.
Advanced systems now include:
4K infrared imaging technology
Full-color infrared documentation (470 nanometers)
Spatial scan technology for consistent documentation
Enhanced capabilities to capture energy fields associated with objects
These technological improvements allow for uniform and consistent data collection across different environments. The methodology ensures that documented phenomena can be analyzed with greater precision by tracking stellar movements consistently across all collected footage. This systematic approach provides more reliable evidence than was previously possible.
Recent Congressional hearings referenced approximately 171 documented encounters that remain unexplained, highlighting the volume of credible observations captured with modern equipment. This growing body of evidence has helped transition the topic from fringe discussions to serious government investigations.
Congressional Perspectives on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
Congressional attitudes toward Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) have undergone significant shifts in recent years. The joint Congressional hearings in 2025 demonstrate a marked change in how elected officials approach this once-taboo subject.
During these recent hearings, three reputable witnesses provided testimony that challenged previous dismissive attitudes. The testimony included references to approximately 171 documented Pentagon video recordings of unexplained aerial encounters that remain under investigation.
Several moments during the hearings revealed information limitations, with witnesses occasionally stating they could not discuss certain matters in open sessions. These moments highlighted the need for Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities (SCIFs) where classified discussions could occur away from public scrutiny.
The Congressional engagement level with UAP topics has intensified dramatically. What was once considered politically risky or career-damaging has become a serious matter of national security interest and scientific inquiry.
Key Congressional Hearing Points:
Testimony from three credible witnesses
Reference to 171 Pentagon-released video recordings
Multiple instances where witnesses declined to answer in public settings
No SCIFs were made available for classified discussions
The terminology shift from "UFO" to "UAP" has helped legitimize Congressional inquiry. This change in language has removed some of the stigma previously associated with the topic, allowing for more productive discussions about unexplained phenomena.
Freedom of Information Act limitations present challenges for public transparency. Congressional oversight of Pentagon UAP programs faces information access barriers, as FOIA only applies to executive branch materials.
Documentation quality remains a concern in these hearings. While government evidence often relies on 680p FLIR footage, advanced technology like 4K infrared imaging could potentially provide clearer documentation of these phenomena.
The bipartisan nature of Congressional interest suggests UAPs have transcended traditional political divisions. Both parties have shown willingness to engage with the topic seriously, marking a significant departure from previous decades of institutional skepticism.
Summary of Congressional Hearing on Unexplained Aerial Phenomena
The joint Congressional committee recently held significant hearings regarding unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP), formerly known as UFOs. Three credible witnesses provided testimony, with some information deemed too sensitive for public disclosure. During certain moments, witnesses were forced to state they couldn't discuss specific details in an open forum, suggesting the need for a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF).
Pentagon officials referenced approximately 171 recorded UAP encounters that remain unexplained. This represents a substantial collection of documented incidents that challenge conventional explanation. The military has compiled these records through various observation methods and reporting systems.
The terminology shift from "UFO" to "UAP" reflects an effort to remove stigma from the subject. This change began largely after the 2004 USS Nimitz encounters, allowing for more serious scientific and governmental investigation. The new designation helps separate legitimate aerial phenomena from the cultural baggage associated with "UFOs."
Congress members showed unprecedented openness to the topic, marking a significant shift in official attitudes. Many representatives who might have dismissed such discussions a decade ago participated earnestly in the hearings. The increased political receptivity stems partly from improved documentation technologies and methods for capturing these phenomena.
Documentation quality remains a critical issue in UAP research. Government-released footage often uses 680p FLIR (Forward-Looking Infrared) technology, while more advanced systems can capture higher resolution imagery. Some researchers utilize 4K infrared systems operating at specific nanometer ranges to document not only the objects but also their associated energy fields.
